Important Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) Exam Questions

Answer: C

Explanation:

The best focus for testing efforts to determine whether to produce a product at scale is desirability, viability, and feasibility, which are the three key dimensions of design thinking that evaluate whether a product is desirable for users, viable for business, and feasible for technology. Novelty, privacy, and potential to go viral or competitive advantage, impact, and own ability are not comprehensive enough to cover all aspects of design thinking.

Answer: C

Explanation:

The steps that should be taken to achieve the goal of creating vision statements using a collaborative, research-backed process are Gather, Envision, Plan. These steps involve gathering data and insights from research, envisioning possible future states based on insights, and planning how to communicate and execute the vision. Reference: https://trailhead.salesforce.com/en/content/learn/modules/salesforce-strategy-designer-certification-prep/create-vision-statements

Answer: B

Explanation:

The best method to improve feasibility of a concept direction that involves sustainable materials is to run a cost benefit analysis, which is a quantitative way of comparing the costs and benefits of different alternatives and finding the optimal solution. Creating a functional prototype or reviewing and aligning with company V2MOM may not address the feasibility issue directly.

Answer: C

Explanation:

The strategy designer should conduct an expert interview in consumer device engineering to determine whether or not to pursue this product idea. An expert interview is a way to gather information and insights from someone who has specialized knowledge or experience in a relevant domain. It can help validate assumptions, identify risks, and explore opportunities for innovation. Performing secondary research may not provide enough depth or specificity for this product idea. Hiring an engineer may be premature and costly at this stage.

Answer: C

Explanation:

Subjective feedback often occurs when the parameters of a critique are not clearly established. Providing clear guidelines helps participants understand the context, objectives, and specific areas where feedback is needed, focusing the discussion on constructive and objective observations rather than personal preferences.