Important BCS PDP9 Exam Questions

Answer: C

Explanation:

The main establishment of a controller or a processor in the EU is the place where the decisions on the purposes and means of the processing of personal data are taken and implemented. According to Recital 36 of the GDPR, the main establishment of a controller with establishments in more than one Member State should be the place of its central administration in the EU, unless the decisions on the processing are taken in another establishment of the controller in the EU and the latter establishment has the power to have such decisions implemented, in which case the establishment having taken such decisions should be considered to be the main establishment. Similarly, the main establishment of a processor with establishments in more than one Member State should be the place of its central administration in the EU, or, if the processor has no central administration in the EU, the establishment of the processor in the EU where the main processing activities take place to the extent that the processor is subject to specific obligations under the GDPR. The main establishment is relevant for determining the lead supervisory authority, the applicable law, and the jurisdiction of the courts for cross-border processing of personal data. In this case, the company's main establishment would be Germany, as it is the place where the company board and administrative functions are based and where the decisions on the processing of personal data are likely to be taken and implemented.Reference:

Recital 36 of the GDPR8

Article 4(16) of the GDPR9

Article 56 of the GDPR

Answer: D

Explanation:

Artificial intelligence (AI) is the use of digital systems to perform tasks that would normally require human intelligence, such as recognition, decision making, learning and adaptation. AI can bring many benefits to society, such as innovation, efficiency, personalisation and convenience. However, AI also carries new and complex risks that are not present in other technologies, such as opacity, unpredictability, bias, discrimination, intrusion, manipulation and harm. These risks can affect the rights and freedoms of individuals, especially their data protection rights, such as privacy, transparency, fairness, accuracy and accountability. Therefore, a risk-based approach to the use of AI is necessary, which means identifying, assessing and mitigating the potential adverse impacts of AI on individuals and society, while balancing them with the benefits and opportunities.A risk-based approach also means complying with the relevant legal and ethical frameworks, such as the UK GDPR and the DPA 2018, and following the best practices and guidance issued by the ICO and other authorities on AI and data protection234.Reference:

Guidance on AI and data protection2

Explaining decisions made with AI3

AI auditing framework4

Answer: D

Explanation:

Article 30 of the UK GDPR3requires both controllers and processors to maintain records of their processing activities, unless they are exempted under certain conditions. The records must contain the following information, among others:

the name and contact details of the controller or the processor, and of any joint controller, representative or data protection officer;

the purposes of the processing;

the categories of data subjects and personal data;

the categories of recipients to whom the personal data have been or will be disclosed, including recipients in third countries or international organisations;

where applicable, transfers of personal data to a third country or an international organisation, including the identification of that third country or international organisation and the documentation of suitable safeguards;

where possible, the envisaged time limits for erasure of the different categories of data;

where possible, a general description of the technical and organisational security measures.

The records must be in writing, including in electronic form, and must be made available to the ICO on request. The records do not need to contain contact details of the supervisory authority, as this is not specified in Article 30. Nor do they need to be submitted to the ICO following every DPIA, as this is not required by Article 35, which only obliges the controller to consult the ICO prior to the processing if the DPIA indicates that the processing would result in a high risk in the absence of measures taken by the controller to mitigate the risk.Reference:

Article 30 of the UK GDPR3

Article 35 of the UK GDPR4

Answer: D

Explanation:

The two businesses are both joint controllers of the information contained in the single order system, because they jointly determine the purposes and means of the processing. They have a shared purpose of selling their products by mail order and they agree on the means of processing by using a single online website and a single order system. Their decisions complement each other and are necessary for the processing to take place. The processing by each party is inseparable and inextricably linked. Therefore, they meet the criteria for joint controllership under the GDPR.Reference:

Article 26 of the GDPR1

Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR2, pp. 16-24

Answer: B

Explanation:

According to the GDPR, a transfer of personal data to a third country or an international organisation occurs when the personal data is made available to someone outside the EU and EEA, regardless of whether the data is physically sent or not. Therefore, the fact that the Chinese business accesses the platform and the databases that contain personal data of the French company's customers constitutes a transfer of personal data to China, which is a third country under the GDPR. The French company, as the controller of the personal data, must ensure that the transfer complies with the GDPR requirements and that the level of protection of the personal data is not undermined. This means that the French company must identify and implement an appropriate transfer mechanism, such as an adequacy decision, appropriate safeguards, or derogations for specific situations, as set out in Chapter V of the GDPR. A data processing agreement, although necessary to define the roles and responsibilities of the controller and the processor, is not sufficient to ensure the legality of the transfer, as it does not provide the same guarantees as the GDPR. China is not a country that has been recognised by the European Commission as providing an adequate level of protection for personal data, so the French company cannot rely on an adequacy decision either.Reference:

Article 44 of the GDPR1

ICO guidance on international transfers2