Important Nokia 4A0-112 Exam Questions

Answer: B

Explanation:

Router R1 is the one that performs the summarization of the two subnets (20.20.1.0/24 and 20.20.2.0/24) into the summarized route 20.20.0.0/16. However, R1 itself will not see any change in its routing table because it is directly connected to both subnets and already knows about them.

Router R2, which is in Area 49.0002, will benefit from this summarization because it previously had separate routes for both 20.20.1.0/24 and 20.20.2.0/24. After the summarization, R2 will only need to maintain a single route to 20.20.0.0/16, reducing the size of its routing table.

Router R4 does not directly benefit from the summarization because it is only connected to the Level 1 network and has no need for the summarized routes from R1. Thus, the summarization does not affect R4's routing table.

Answer: B

Explanation:

Router R1 is configured as L1/L2, meaning it is part of both Level 1 and Level 2 IS-IS routing areas. This means R1 will generate two types of LSPs:

Level 1 LSP (for the local area 49.0001) to advertise its local topology to other Level 1 routers.

Level 2 LSP (for the backbone area 49.0002) to advertise the global network topology to Level 2 routers.

R1 also has two broadcast interfaces, and as the Designated Intermediate System (DIS) on these interfaces, it will generate an LSP for each interface (one per broadcast link).

This results in three total LSPs:

A Level 1 LSP for the local area (49.0001).

A Level 2 LSP for the backbone area (49.0002).

An LSP for each of the two broadcast interfaces, which may include interface-related topology information.

Answer: B

Explanation:

The adjacency database contains information about the state of the router's adjacencies (i.e., the routers that it is directly connected to and has established a neighbor relationship with). It does not store information about all links in the domain; that information is stored in the link-state database.

Answer: A

Explanation:

Typically, interfaces on a Nokia 7750 SR router are not configured in pairs on the same subnet for redundancy. Instead, redundancy is achieved through mechanisms like Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) or other high availability protocols, not by simply using interfaces in pairs on the same subnet.

Answer: D

Explanation:

The static route configured on router R1 uses an indirect next-hop, which is 10.10.10.3 (R3). While the echo request from R1 reaches the server through the IGP, the problem lies in the return path for the echo response.

The route 10.4.100.0/24 is reachable through R3, but there is no reciprocal route in R3's routing table that allows the response to flow back towards R1. This results in a failure to return the echo response to R1, causing the ping to fail.